Courts · Archive
Supreme Court limits key provision of the landmark Voting Rights Act
The 6-3 ruling in Louisiana v. Callais could reshape congressional map battles across the country.
The Supreme Court issued a 6-3 ruling in Louisiana v. Callais that narrows Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and strikes down Louisiana’s second majority-Black district.
The Supreme Court on April 29 issued a 6-3 ruling in Louisiana v. Callais that narrows how Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act can be used in redistricting.
The decision struck down Louisiana’s second majority-Black congressional district and could force map redraws in other states. AP and The Washington Post reported the ruling as a major change to how the landmark civil rights law operates in congressional map disputes.
The case arose from Louisiana’s post-2020 Census congressional map and later redraws. According to the reporting, the Court’s decision could have broad consequences for future challenges to district maps and for how minority-majority seats are protected.
The practical fallout will likely depend on how quickly states and lower courts respond. For now, the ruling marks one of the most significant redistricting decisions in years and a major shift in voting-rights litigation.